Quote:
From the Mail Online - The decision means the snack will remain free of VAT, which will save manufacturers Procter & Gamble millions.
During the hearing at the High Court in London Mr Justice Warren was asked to consider the ' potatoness' of a Pringle.
He was told by P&G's barrister that Pringles, which have a distinctive patented shape, were more like biscuits or cakes than crisps.
Richard Cordara QC, appearing for P&G, told the High Court: 'The appearance and taste of a Pringle is not that of a potato crisp.
'It has none of the irregularity and variety of shape that it always present in crisps. It has a shape not found in nature being designed and manufactured for stacking.'
|
Lawyers - don't you just love them. Crime rate through the roof and some toff succesfully wins a case to prove crisps (come off it - there crisps!!!!) are not crisps. Wonder how much his firm made from the case?
They will be saying ready meals aren't food next - they certainly don't look like food and definatly taste like s**t.